Why did Qibo’s appeal fail?
In recent years, the trial process of Qvod cases has attracted widespread attention. As a typical case in China’s Internet industry, Qvod’s failure to appeal not only involves legal issues, but also reflects the strengthening of industry supervision and changes in social values. This article will combine the hot topics and hot content on the Internet in the past 10 days, analyze the reasons why Qvod appeals failed, and display relevant background information through structured data.
1. Case review
Kuaibo Company was prosecuted on suspicion of distributing obscene materials for profit, and the first instance ruled that Kuaibo Company and relevant responsible persons had committed a crime. Qvod subsequently appealed, but ultimately failed. The following are the key time points of the case:
| time | event |
|---|---|
| January 2016 | Kuaibo Company was sued |
| September 2016 | The first instance ruled that Kuaibo Company and relevant responsible persons constituted a crime |
| December 2016 | Qvod Company files an appeal |
| January 2017 | The appeal was dismissed and the original verdict was upheld. |
2. Analysis of reasons for appeal failure
The reasons why Qvod’s appeal failed can be analyzed from three levels: legal, technical and social:
1. Legal aspect
The court found that Kuaibo Company, as a network service provider, failed to fulfill its reasonable management obligations, resulting in the dissemination of a large number of obscene videos through its platform. According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, Qvod's actions constitute the crime of distributing obscene materials for profit. The following are relevant legal provisions:
| Legal terms | content |
|---|---|
| Article 363 of the Criminal Code | Anyone who produces, copies, publishes, sells, or disseminates obscene materials for the purpose of profit shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention, or surveillance, and shall also be fined; if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years and not more than 10 years, and shall also be fined; if the circumstances are particularly serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined, or his property shall be confiscated. |
| Article 364 of the Criminal Code | Those who disseminate obscene books, periodicals, videos, audio and video, pictures or other obscene materials, if the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years, criminal detention or public surveillance. |
2. Technical level
Kuaibo argued that its technology was neutral, but the court held that Kuaibo accelerated the spread of obscene videos through P2P technology and failed to take effective measures to prevent the spread of such content. The following are the characteristics and impacts of fast broadcast technology:
| Technical features | Influence |
|---|---|
| P2P acceleration | Improved the dissemination efficiency of obscene videos |
| caching mechanism | Resulting in a large number of obscene videos being stored on the server |
| Lack of content moderation | Failure to effectively filter illegal content |
3. Social level
The trial of the Qvod case comes at a time when China’s Internet industry is strengthening content supervision. Society's demand for the purification of the Internet environment is becoming increasingly strong, and Qvod's behavior has been identified as a serious violation of social order and good customs. The following is the relevant social background:
| social background | Influence |
|---|---|
| Internet content supervision strengthened | The government has tightened its management of online platforms |
| Increased public demands for network environment | Public criticism of Kuaibo Company has increased |
| Increased awareness of industry self-discipline | Other platforms have strengthened content review |
3. Hot topics on the Internet
In the past 10 days, discussions on the Qvod case have mainly focused on the following aspects:
| topic | heat index |
|---|---|
| The legal significance of the fast broadcast case | 85 |
| The future of Internet content regulation | 78 |
| Controversy over fast broadcast technology | 72 |
| changes in social values | 65 |
4. Conclusion
There are many reasons why Qvod’s appeal failed, including strict legal determinations, technical management loopholes, and the promotion of the social environment. This case not only had a profound impact on Kuaibo itself, but also provided an important warning for the healthy development of China’s Internet industry.
As Internet technology continues to advance, platform responsibility and content supervision will become key issues for future development. The outcome of the Qvod case reminds all network service providers that while innovating in technology, they must earnestly fulfill their social responsibilities and jointly maintain a clean cyberspace.
check the details
check the details
en
